Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Moral judgement close to home

Stafford, Charles ORCID: 0000-0002-8024-5563 (2018) Moral judgement close to home. Social Anthropology, 26 (1). pp. 117-129. ISSN 0964-0282

Text - Accepted Version
Download (420kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1111/1469-8676.12480


In theory, anthropologists should suspend judgment of those they study – that is, on the grounds of cultural relativism. In reality, however, moral judgments undoubtedly pervade the everyday experience of fieldwork, not to mention that anthropologists sometimes take an explicitly critical stance towards the societies they study. This essay, together with others in this special issue, explores the consequences for this when the ethnographer has a biographical connection to the object of his or her research. Having briefly discussed the case of Bourdieu's project in Béarn, where he had spent his childhood, I turn to my own experience of doing a project in Oklahoma. The very 'likable' people I have met there – many of whom come from the same background as my parents – also support (on aggregate) political positions that I disagree with. As an anthropologist, I could suspend judgment of them while trying to grasp the historical circumstances that have led them to think and act in the ways that they do. However, my biographical connection complicates this process, I suggest, personalising things – and potentially heightening the emotions that drive moral judgements – just when a lack of sympathy and emotional engagement may be what is called for.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2018 European Association of Social Anthropologists.
Divisions: Anthropology
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GN Anthropology
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2017 15:35
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2021 01:22

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics