Jackson, Emily 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2052-2776
(2018)
From ‘doctor knows best’ to dignity: placing adults who lack capacity at the centre of decisions about their medical treatment.
Modern Law Review, 81 (2).
247 - 281.
ISSN 0026-7961
|
Text
- Accepted Version
Download (705kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 1989, the House of Lords first derived a ‘best interests’ test for the medical treatment of adults who lack capacity from the doctrine of necessity and, now codified, the test continues to apply today. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets out a non‐exhaustive checklist of relevant considerations, but it gives no particular priority to the patient's wishes. There is also no formal expectation that the patient will participate directly in any court proceedings in which her best interests are to be determined. This article will consider the advantages and disadvantages of providing additional guidance to decision‐makers in order to help them navigate both taking seriously the wishes of people who lack capacity and, at the same time, not abandoning patients who need help and support. More specifically, this article advocates formalising current best practice in the Court of Protection through the introduction of a series of rebuttable presumptions, or starting points.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682230 |
| Additional Information: | © 2017 The Author |
| Divisions: | Law |
| Subjects: | K Law > KD England and Wales R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2017 13:21 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 21:30 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/84116 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics