Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Minor, substantial or wholesale amendments: it’s time to rethink changes to published articles and avoid unnecessary stigma

Barbour, Virginia and Bloom, Theodora and Lin, Jennifer and Moylan, Elizabeth (2017) Minor, substantial or wholesale amendments: it’s time to rethink changes to published articles and avoid unnecessary stigma. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (05 Jun 2017). Blog Entry.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (176kB) | Preview

Abstract

The present system of labelling changes made to published articles is confusing, inconsistently applied, and out of step with digital publishing. It carries negative connotations for authors, editors, and publishers. Is there a way to efficiently and neutrally flag a change to a published article in a way that says what happened that is separated from why it happened? Virginia Barbour, Theodora Bloom, Jennifer Lin and Elizabeth Moylan propose a new system for dealing with post-publication changes that focuses on moving away from the current, confusing, stigmatising terms, differentiating the scale of changes, and differentiating versions of articles. While some hold the view that post-publication corrections must be tied to punishment of “offenders”, the role of journals is to be neutral, to maintain the integrity of the literature and not to punish researchers.

Item Type: Website (Blog Entry)
Official URL: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences
Additional Information: © 2017 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN1990 Broadcasting
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Sets: Collections > Impact of Social Sciences Blog at LSE
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2017 10:45
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2017 10:45
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/81346

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics