Dolan, Paul, Kavetsos, Georgios, Kudrna, Laura, Laffan, Kate 
ORCID: 0000-0002-3366-7704 and Testoni, Stefano
(2016)
What is happiness? Should citizens choose or should we simply measure it more accurately?
LSE Behavioural Science
(23 May 2016).
Blog Entry.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (185kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Your question sounds very pertinent, Charlie Brown, now that monitoring happiness is a serious policy objective. How we define happiness is key, as it will inform and guide policy interventions. But, still, how should we define it? Perhaps as the absence of pain, in the wake of Epicurean notions? Or as maximising pleasure, following the utilitarian tradition? Or maybe as the pursuit of purpose beyond hedonism, echoing Aristotle? To some degree, all the above seem to matter. So, Charlie Brown, the issue is perhaps how best to ‘summarise’ happiness without assigning too much or too little weight to any aspect therein.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Blog Entry) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/behaviouralscience/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2016 The Author(s) |
| Divisions: | Psychological and Behavioural Science Social Policy LSE Health |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2017 12:06 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 21:28 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/81220 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics