The problem of purpose in quality of life research.
Technical Report 02/06.
London School of Economics and Political Science, CPNSS, London, UK.
In this paper I investigate one aspect of the validity of a certain type of subjective assessment of health and illness or as they are sometimes called Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures. These assessments are typically a series of questions directed to individual patients in the form of a questionnaire and their aim is to discover the subjective experience of a cohort of people at different times, for instance before and after a surgical intervention. These measurements can be, and often are used in conjunction with clinical assessments to gain information on health outcomes for policy implementation or revision. For example, to determine which hospitals or surgeons are doing well and which ones are doing poorly or to determine which interventions are most effective.
||Published 2006 © Leah McClimans. LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (<http://eprints.lse.ac.uk>) of the LSE Research Online website.
||Health-related quality of life, philosophy of Social Science, measurement, validity
|Library of Congress subject classification:
||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
||Technical Report 02/06
Actions (login required)
||Record administration - authorised staff only