Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian ORCID: 0000-0003-1627-800X (2017) What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories. Philosophical Review, 126 (4). pp. 421-479. ISSN 0031-8108
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
Download (930kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We present a new “reason-based” approach to the formal representation of moral theories, drawing on recent decision-theoretic work. We show that any moral theory within a very large class can be represented in terms of two parameters: (i) a specification of which properties of the objects of moral choice matter in any given context, and (ii) a specification of how these properties matter. Reasonbased representations provide a very general taxonomy of moral theories, as di↵erences among theories can be attributed to di↵erences in their two key parameters. We can thus formalize several distinctions, such as between consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories, between universalist and relativist theories, between agent-neutral and agent-relative theories, between monistic and pluralistic theories, between atomistic and holistic theories, and between theories with a teleological structure and those without. Reason-based representations also shed light on an important but under-appreciated phenomenon: the “underdetermination of moral theory by deontic content”
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://philreview.dukejournals.org/ |
Additional Information: | © 2017 Cornell University |
Divisions: | Government Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method CPNSS |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy |
Date Deposited: | 03 May 2017 16:34 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2024 19:36 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/75232 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |