Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Housing policies in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and the United States: lessons learned

Hilber, Christian A.L. and Schöni, Olivier (2016) Housing policies in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and the United States: lessons learned. Cityscape, 18 (3). pp. 291-332. ISSN 1936-007X

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (485kB) | Preview

Abstract

We provide an analysis of the housing market and current housing policies in three developed countries: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and the United States. We focus on these three countries mainly because of the marked differences in their institutional settings. The United Kingdom is characterized by fiscal centralization and an extraordinarily rigid planning system. The consequences of this setting, which make housing supply extremely unresponsive to changes in house prices, are a high degree of urban containment, a severe housing affordability crisis, and a housing shortage, particularly for the young. The key UK policy, Help-to-Buy, which focuses on stimulating housing demand, fails to address the affordability crisis, because increasing demand only pushes up house prices further without expanding housing supply. Fiscal decentralization and a lax zoning system—both are encouraging residential development—and an extraordinarily low homeownership rate explain why Switzerland’s main political concerns are sprawl and rent stabilization. The country’s key policies aim to tackle these two concerns, but those same policies have some important unintended consequences. The United States is characterized by fiscal federalism and an enormous variation in the tightness of land use restrictiveness across metropolitan areas. The key policy concern across the country is homeownership attainment and the key policy to tackle this issue is the mortgage interest deduction (MID). This policy backfires in metropolitan areas that are prosperous and where land use is tightly regulated— “superstar cities”—because, in these places, the policy-induced demand increase mainly pushes up house prices. The MID increases homeownership attainment of only higher-income households in metropolitan areas with lax land use regulation. The net effect of the policy on homeownership attainment across the country is essentially zero. We conclude that the assessment of housing policies crucially depends on the fiscal and regulatory environment in local housing markets. Policies that stimulate housing demand, such as the MID or Help-to-Buy, are doomed to fail in markets with tight regulation or otherwise tight supply.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/citysca...
Additional Information: © 2016 Asian Development Bank Institute. This work is protected by copyright and was used in Cityscape with the permission of the copyright owner ADBI.
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Spatial Economics Research Centre
Centre for Economic Performance
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Sets: Departments > Geography and Environment
Research centres and groups > Spatial Economics Research Centre
Research centres and groups > Centre for Economic Performance (CEP)
Date Deposited: 06 Apr 2017 13:12
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2018 15:25
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72818

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics