Scientific Misbehavior in Economics: Unacceptable research practice linked to perceived pressure to publish.

Necker, Sarah (2014) Scientific Misbehavior in Economics: Unacceptable research practice linked to perceived pressure to publish. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (23 Jul 2014). Website.

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (299kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

Upholding research integrity depends on our ability to understand the extent of misconduct. Sarah Necker describes her landmark study on economists’ research norms and practices. Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are widely considered to be unjustifiable, but misbehaviour is still prevalent. For example, 1-3% of economists surveyed admit that they have accepted or offered gifts, money, or sex in exchange for co-authorship, data, or promotion. Economists’ perceived pressure to publish is found to be positively related to their admission of being involved in several rejected research practices.

Item Type:	Online resource (Website)
Official URL:	http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences
Additional Information:	© 2014 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Date Deposited:	29 Mar 2017 13:35
Last Modified:	15 Sep 2023 19:25
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/71461

Actions (login required)

View Item