Rather than narrow our definition of impact, we should use metrics to explore richness and diversity of outcomes.

Tinkler, Jane ORCID: 0000-0002-5306-3940 (2015) Rather than narrow our definition of impact, we should use metrics to explore richness and diversity of outcomes. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (28 Jul 2015). Website.

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (179kB) | Preview

• Publisher

Abstract

Impact is multi-dimensional, the routes by which impact occur are different across disciplines and sectors, and impact changes over time. Jane Tinkler argues that if institutions like HEFCE specify a narrow set of impact metrics, more harm than good would come to universities forced to limit their understanding of how research is making a difference. But qualitative and quantitative indicators continue to be an incredible source of learning for how impact works in each of our disciplines, locations or sectors.

Item Type:	Online resource (Website)
Official URL:	http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences
Additional Information:	© 2015 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Date Deposited:	24 Mar 2017 16:24
Last Modified:	16 May 2024 07:53
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/70757

Actions (login required)

View Item