Kulkarni, Sneha
(2016)
Manipulating the peer review process: why it happens and how it might be prevented.
Impact of Social Sciences Blog
(13 Dec 2016).
Website.
Abstract
Peer review continues to be upheld as the best way to evaluate academic research ahead of publication. Yet the peer review process has been consistently targeted and manipulated by authors, reviewers and even editors. Sneha Kulkarni reveals how this is happening and what might be done to prevent it, considering the merits of different peer review models but also the target-driven culture of academia that leads some to engage in misconduct.
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |