Voorhoeve, Alex ORCID: 0000-0003-3240-3835 (2018) Balancing small against large burdens. Behavioural Public Policy, 2 (1). pp. 125-142. ISSN 2398-063X
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
Download (244kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Common principles for resource allocation in health care can prioritize the alleviation of small health burdens over lifesaving treatment. I argue that there is some evidence that these principles are at odds with a sizable share of public opinion, which holds that saving a life should take priority over any number of cures for minor ailments. I propose two possible explanations for this opinion, one debunking and one vindicatory. I also outline how well-designed surveys and moral enquiry could help decide between them. Finally, I consider how priority-setting principles could be adjusted if the view that saving a life always trumps alleviating small burdens were vindicated.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioura... |
Additional Information: | © 2017 Cambridge University Press |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2017 14:10 |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2024 05:36 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/68965 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |