Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Feminist philosophy, pragmatism, and the “turn to affect”: a genealogical critique

Fischer, Clara (2016) Feminist philosophy, pragmatism, and the “turn to affect”: a genealogical critique. Hypatia, 31 (4). pp. 810-826. ISSN 0887-5367

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1111/hypa.12296

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a focus on feeling as a topic of reinvigorated scholarly concern, described by theorists in a range of disciplines in terms of a “turn to affect.” Surprisingly little has been said about this most recent shift in critical theorizing by philosophers, including feminist philosophers, despite the fact that affect theorists situate their work within feminist and related, sometimes intersectional, political projects. In this article, I redress the seeming elision of the “turn to affect” in feminist philosophy, and develop a critique of some of the claims made by affect theorists that builds upon concerns regarding the “newness” of affect and emotion in feminist theory, and the risks of erasure this may entail. To support these concerns, I present a brief genealogy of feminist philosophical work on affect and emotion. Identifying a reductive tendency within affect theory to equate affect with bodily immanence, and to preclude cognition, culture, and representation, I argue that contemporary feminist theorists would do well to follow the more holistic models espoused by the canon of feminist work on emotion. Furthermore, I propose that prominent affect theorist Brian Massumi is right to return to pragmatism as a means of redressing philosophical dualisms, such as emotion/cognition and mind/body, but suggest that such a project is better served by John Dewey's philosophy of emotion than by William James's.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(IS...
Additional Information: © 2016 Hypatia, Inc.
Divisions: Gender Studies
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Sets: Departments > Gender Institute
Date Deposited: 16 Jan 2017 13:52
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2019 11:49
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/68872

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item