Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Does language matter? Exploring Chinese-Korean differences in holistic perception

Rhode, Ann Kristin, Voyer, Benjamin G. and Gleibs, Ilka H. ORCID: 0000-0002-9913-250X (2016) Does language matter? Exploring Chinese-Korean differences in holistic perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (1508). ISSN 1664-1078

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (392kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01508

Abstract

Cross-cultural research suggests that East Asians display a holistic attentional bias by paying attention to the entire field and to relationships between objects, whereas Westerners pay attention primarily to salient objects, displaying an analytic attentional bias. The assumption 20 of a universal pan-Asian holistic attentional bias has however recently been challenged in experimental research involving Japanese and Chinese participants, which suggests that linguistic factors may contribute to the formation of East Asians’ holistic attentional patterns. The present experimental research explores differences in attention and information processing styles between Korean and Chinese speakers, who have been assumed to display 25 the same attentional bias due to cultural commonalities. We hypothesize that the specific structure of the Korean language predisposes speakers to pay more attention to ground information than to figure information, thus leading to a stronger holistic attentional bias compared to Chinese speakers. Findings of the present research comparing different groups of English, Chinese, and Korean speakers provide further evidence for differences in East 30 Asians’ holistic attentional bias, which may be due to the influence of language. Furthermore, we also extend prior theorizing by discussing the potential impact of other cultural factors. In line with critical voices calling for more research investigating differences between cultures that are assumed to be culturally similar, we highlight important avenues for future studies exploring the language-culture relationship.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/psychology
Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors © CC BY 4.0
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GT Manners and customs
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2016 12:09
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2024 16:30
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67922

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics