Baccini, Alberto and De Nicolao, Giuseppe (2016) Peer review and bibliometric indicators just don’t match upaccording to re-analysis of Italian research evaluation. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (16 Jun 2016). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (167kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Italian research evaluation agency undertook an extensive analysis to compare the results of peer review and bibliometric indicators for research evaluation. Their findings suggested both indicators produced similar results. Researchers Alberto Baccini and Giuseppe De Nicolao re-examine these results and find notable disagreements between the two techniques of evaluation in the sample and outline below the major shortcoming in the Italian Agency’s interpretation. Results from one technique will differ from those reached using the other.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2016 LSE Impact of Social Sciences © CC BY 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2016 09:15 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Sep 2023 20:19 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67285 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics