Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Peer review and bibliometric indicators just don’t match upaccording to re-analysis of Italian research evaluation

Baccini, Alberto and De Nicolao, Giuseppe (2016) Peer review and bibliometric indicators just don’t match upaccording to re-analysis of Italian research evaluation. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (16 Jun 2016). Blog Entry.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (167kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Italian research evaluation agency undertook an extensive analysis to compare the results of peer review and bibliometric indicators for research evaluation. Their findings suggested both indicators produced similar results. Researchers Alberto Baccini and Giuseppe De Nicolao re-examine these results and find notable disagreements between the two techniques of evaluation in the sample and outline below the major shortcoming in the Italian Agency’s interpretation. Results from one technique will differ from those reached using the other.

Item Type: Website (Blog Entry)
Official URL: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information: © 2016 LSE Impact of Social Sciences © CC BY 3.0
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Sets: Collections > Impact of Social Sciences Blog at LSE
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2016 09:15
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2016 13:40
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67285

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics