Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

From peer review to PCAOB inspections: regulating for audit quality in the U.S.

Löhlein, Lukas (2016) From peer review to PCAOB inspections: regulating for audit quality in the U.S. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36. pp. 28-47. ISSN 0737-4607

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (525kB) | Preview
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.002

Abstract

This study reviews the existing literature on the U.S. peer review system and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection system to assess our knowledge of audit regulation. The traditional self-regulatory system of the accounting profession came to an end, in 2002, when the PCAOB was established to oversee the audit firms of publicly traded companies. This paper contributes to the controversial debate about self-regulation versus independent regulation by analyzing, categorizing, and comparing the research findings on the peer review system and the PCAOB system along three dimensions: the validity of peer reviews and PCAOB inspections, the recognition of reviews and inspections by decision-makers (e.g., investors, bankers, committees), and the effect of reviews and inspections on audit quality. Synthesizing the research on the regulatory regimes suggests that the notion of external quality control, both through peer reviews and government inspections, is positively linked with an improvement of audit quality. At the same time, the analysis indicates that external users do not seem to recognise peer review and PCAOB reports as very useful instruments for decision-making, which is in line with an identified rather skeptical perception of the audit profession on reviews and inspections. Overall, this study reveals that although the academic literature on peer review and PCAOB inspection is extensive it has not produced definitive conclusions concerning various aspects of audit regulation. This paper shows how this blurred picture is due to conflicting research findings, the dominance of the quantitative research paradigm, and unchallenged assumptions within the literature, and concludes by proposing research opportunities for the future.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accoun...
Additional Information: © 2016 University of Florida, Fisher School of Accounting
Divisions: Accounting
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Sets: Departments > Accounting
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2016 14:59
Last Modified: 20 May 2020 03:26
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67147

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics