Briscoe, Forrest, Gupta, Abhinav and Anner, Mark (2016) For activist campaigns, disruption gains attention, but evidence-based education changes minds. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (17 May 2016). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (149kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In their campaigns to get organizations to adopt socially responsible practices, social activists often choose between disruptive protests and evidence-based persuasion. But which tactics are more effective? Forrest Briscoe, Abhinav Gupta, and Mark Anner find that disruptive tactics actually hurt activists’ goal of capitalizing on their wins to influence non-targeted organizations. In contrast, when activists used evidence-based tactics, their wider goals were furthered.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2016 LSE Impact of Social Sciences © CC BY 3.0 |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Jun 2016 09:56 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Sep 2024 00:29 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/66736 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics