Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Measuring the independence of audit oversight entities: a comparative empirical analysis

Löhlein, Lukas (2017) Measuring the independence of audit oversight entities: a comparative empirical analysis. Accounting Research Journal, 30 (2). pp. 165-184. ISSN 1030-9616

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (571kB) | Preview
Identification Number: 10.1108/ARJ-05-2015-0071

Abstract

Purpose: Independent audit oversight is a prerequisite for restoring public confidence in financial reporting and auditing after the past accounting scandals and the financial crisis. By analysing and comparing the independence of the audit oversight boards of 27 European Member States and the USA, this study aims to provide insights into the question of how independent “independent” audit oversight boards are. Design/methodology/approach: Independence is measured in terms of the organisational compositions and regulatory competences of the audit oversight authorities. The data were collected through an e-mail questionnaire that was sent to all European oversight authorities, and by analysing legal provisions of various regulators. The results are analysed and visualised by a Partial Order Scalogram Analysis with Coordinates, which allows conclusions about the similarities of various systems and their relative levels of independence. Both measurements are then equally combined into one value of material independence, which is used to rank the oversight authorities. Findings: Although all countries encounter similar pressures to establish profession-independent oversight systems, this study identifies how differently “independence” has been translated in regulatory outcomes. While all countries claim to possess formal independent oversight bodies, there is a visible gap between countries with comparatively strong independent oversight authorities and systems in which accounting bodies still maintain far-reaching regulatory influence. At the same time, the results question the role of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) as the globally perceived benchmark of an entirely independent regulator. Research limitations/implications: This study focuses on formal independence rather than de-facto independence. Future research has, therefore, to address how these formal arrangements have evolved in regulatory practice. Practical implications: Policy makers around the world perceive independent oversight as one of the essential elements of regulatory reforms aiming at restoring public confidence in the aftermath of past accounting scandals. This study enables the comparison and benchmarking of national specific regulatory designs with other forms of independent oversight. Originality/value: Although the role of independent regulation is a recurring theme in accounting research, a systematic and encompassing comparison of the intertwining of audit oversight authorities and the accounting profession has not yet been provided. This study takes a first step towards providing a quantifiable measure of the formal independence of audit oversight authorities by mobilizing concepts, methods and prior findings from the field of public policy research.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journal/arj
Additional Information: © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Divisions: Accounting
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Sets: Departments > Accounting
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2016 12:29
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2020 06:17
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65370

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics