Supporters and underminers: reply to Chandler

Bradley, Richard ORCID: 0000-0003-2184-7844 (2017) Supporters and underminers: reply to Chandler. Mind, 126 (502). pp. 603-608. ISSN 0026-4423

Preview

Text - Accepted Version Download (426kB) | Preview

• Author

Abstract

I argue that two of the standard axioms of the AGM theory of belief revision stand in the way of it serving as the basis for an adequate account of defeasible reasoning, because they respectively disallow the adoption of beliefs not logically entailed by those previously learned and the abandonment of those not contradicted by them.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/
Additional Information:	© 2016 The Author
Divisions:	Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited:	27 Jan 2016 14:25
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 01:20
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65171

Actions (login required)

View Item