A disaggregative view of customary international law-making

Voyiakis, Emmanuel ORCID: 0000-0002-6351-4733 (2016) A disaggregative view of customary international law-making. Leiden Journal of International Law, 29 (2). pp. 365-388. ISSN 0922-1565

Preview

PDF - Accepted Version Download (613kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article argues that some familiar principles, like the protection of reasonable expectations or fair play, can justify the normative force and binding character of some types of customary international practices. We have no reason to think that any one of those principles can justify all customary practices that are typically taken to have such force. Accordingly, instead of proposing a unifying justification for all customary international law-making, I will suggest that the impact of past international practices on the normative situation of international agents is determined not by one master principle, but by a range of different normative principles, each applicable in different situations. If this is correct, i.e., if the principles that give customary practices their normative force vary depending on the kind of principle governing the practical problem that those practices are meant to respond to, both the critique and the defence of customary law-making must proceed on what I will call a ‘disaggregative’ basis.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information:	© 2016 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law
Divisions:	Law
Subjects:	J Political Science > JX International law J Political Science > JZ International relations K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	19 Jan 2016 10:50
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 01:07
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65055

Actions (login required)

View Item