Alexander, J. McKenzie ORCID: 0000-0002-2663-6993, Himmelreich, Johannes and Thompson, Christopher (2015) Epistemic landscapes, optimal search and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 82 (3). pp. 424-453. ISSN 0031-8248
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (761kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines two questions about scientists’ search for knowledge. First, which search strategies generate discoveries effectively? Second, is it advantageous to diversify search strategies? We argue pace Weisberg and Muldoon (2009) that, on the first question, a search strategy that deliberately seeks novel research approaches need not be optimal. On the second question, we argue they have not shown epistemic reasons exist for the division of cognitive labor, identifying the errors that led to their conclusions. Furthermore, we generalize the epistemic landscape model, showing that one should be skeptical about the benefits of social learning in epistemically complex environments.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://journal.philsci.org/ |
Additional Information: | © 2015 Philosophy of Science Association |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) Q Science > Q Science (General) |
Date Deposited: | 25 Nov 2014 13:20 |
Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2024 00:50 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/60256 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |