Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Resilient and inclusive prosperity within planetary boundaries

Hepburn, Cameron, Beinhocker, Eric, Farmer, J. Doyne and Teytelboym, Alexander (2014) Resilient and inclusive prosperity within planetary boundaries. China and World Economy, 22 (5). pp. 76-92. ISSN 1671-2234

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1749-124X.2014.12085.x


The current model of economic growth generated unprecedented increases in human wealth and prosperity during the 19th and 20th centuries. The main mechanisms have been the rapid pace of technological and social innovation, human capital accumulation, and the conversion of resources and natural capital into more valuable forms of produced capital. However, there is evidence emerging that this model may be approaching environmental limits and planetary boundaries, and that the conversion of natural capital needs to slow down rapidly and then be reversed. Some commentators have asserted that in order for this to occur, we will need to stop growing altogether and, instead, seek prosperity without growth. Others argue that environmental concerns are low-priority luxuries to be contemplated once global growth has properly returned to levels observed prior to the 2008 financial crisis. A third group argues that there is no trade-off, and, instead, promotes green growth: the (politically appealing) idea is that we can simultaneously grow and address our environmental problems. This paper provides a critical perspective on this debate and suggests that a substantial research agenda is required to come to grips with these challenges. One place to start is with the relevant metrics: measures of per-capita wealth, and, eventually, quantitative measures of prosperity, alongside a dashboard of other sustainability indicators. A public and political focus on wealth (a stock), and its annual changes, could realistically complement the current focus on market-based gross output as measured by GDP (a flow). This could have important policy implications, but deeper changes to governance and business models will be required.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2014 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Divisions: Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
JEL classification: O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2014 17:07
Last Modified: 16 May 2024 01:55
Funders: Institute for New Economic Thinking, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item