National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base: a mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes

Challis, David, Tucker, Sue, Wilberforce, Mark, Brand, Christian, Abendstern, Michele, Stewart, Karen, Jasper, Rowan, Harrington, Val, Verbeek, Hilde, Jolley, David, Fernández, José-Luis ORCID: 0000-0002-4190-7341, Dunn, Graham, Knapp, Martin ORCID: 0000-0003-1427-0215 and Bowns, Ian (2014) National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base: a mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes. Programme Grants for Applied Research, 2 (4). pp. 1-480. ISSN 2050-4322

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (11MB) | Preview

• Author

Abstract

Background The rising number of older people with mental health problems makes the effective use of mental health resources imperative. Little is known about the clinical effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness of different service models. Aims The programme aimed to (1) refine and apply an existing planning tool [‘balance of care’ (BoC)] to this client group; (2) identify whether, how and at what cost the mix of institutional and community services could be improved; (3) enable decision-makers to apply the BoC framework independently; (4) identify variation in the structure, organisation and processes of community mental health teams for older people (CMHTsOP); (5) examine whether or not different community mental health teams (CMHTs) models are associated with different costs/outcomes; (6) identify variation in mental health outreach services for older care home residents; (7) scope the evidence on the association between different outreach models and resident outcomes; and (8) disseminate the research findings to multiple stakeholder groups. Methods The programme employed a mixed-methods approach including three systematic literature reviews; a BoC study, which used a systematic framework for choosing between alternative patterns of support by identifying people whose needs could be met in more than one setting and comparing their costs/outcomes; a national survey of CMHTs’ organisation, structure and processes; a multiple case study of CMHTs exhibiting different levels of integration encompassing staff interviews, an observational study of user outcomes and a staff survey; national surveys of CMHTs’ outreach activities and care homes. A planned randomised trial of depression management in care homes was removed at the review stage by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) prior to funding award. Results BoC: Past studies exhibited several methodological limitations, and just two related to older people with mental health problems. The current study suggested that if enhanced community services were available, a substantial proportion of care home and inpatient admissions could be diverted, although only the latter would release significant monies. CMHTsOP: 60% of teams were considered multidisciplinary. Most were colocated, had a single point of access (SPA) and standardised assessment documentation. Evidence of the impact of particular CMHT features was limited. Although staff spoke positively about integration, no evidence was found that more integrated teams produced better user outcomes. Working in high-integration teams was associated with poor job outcomes, but other factors negated the statistical significance of this. Care home outreach: Typical services in the literature undertook some combination of screening (less common), assessment, medication review, behaviour management and training, and evidence suggested intervention can benefit depressed residents. Care home staff were perceived to lack necessary skills, but relatively few CMHTs provided formal training. Limitations Limitations include a necessary reliance on observational rather than experimental methods, which were not feasible given the nature of the services explored. Conclusions BoC: Shifting care towards the community would require the growth of support services; clarification of extra care housing’s (ECH) role; timely responses to people at risk of psychiatric admission; and improved hospital discharge planning. However, the promotion of care at home will not necessarily reduce public expenditure. CMHTsOP: Although practitioners favoured integration, its goals need clarification. Occupational therapists (OTs) and social workers faced difficulties identifying optimal roles, and support workers’ career structures needed delineating. Care home outreach: Further CMHT input to build care home staff skills and screen for depression may be beneficial. Priority areas for further study include the costs and benefits for older people of age inclusive mental health

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar
Additional Information:	© 2014 Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO
Divisions:	Social Policy Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited:	17 Sep 2014 10:20
Last Modified:	12 Dec 2024 00:42
Projects:	RP-PG-0606-1109
Funders:	National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59485

Actions (login required)

View Item