Poulsen, Lauge (2014) There is no need for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement to include investor-state arbitration. LSE American Politics and Policy (14 May 2014). Website.
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (140kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The U.S and the European Union are about to begin the latest round of negotiations towards the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Many argue that the agreement could have considerable economic and political benefits on both sides of the Atlantic. Controversy has erupted, however, over plans to include investment protections provisions typically used in agreements with developing countries. The House of Lords yesterday released its recommendations to the British government about the agreement. It is largely sympathetic to including investor-state arbitration in the agreement, but only on one condition. Lauge Poulsen, who gave evidence to the House of Lords’ hearing process, reflects on the report.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://blo gs.lse.ac.uk/usappblo g/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2014 The Author |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2014 14:07 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Sep 2023 19:18 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/58908 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics