Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Boosting innovation and productivity growth in Europe: the hope and the realities of the EU's "Lisbon agenda"

Center of Economic Performance (2006) Boosting innovation and productivity growth in Europe: the hope and the realities of the EU's "Lisbon agenda". CEP Policy Analysis (CEPPA007). The London School of Economics and Political Science, Center of Economic Performance, London, UK.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (291kB) | Preview

Abstract

The United States has significantly higher productivity than the European average. US GDP per hour is over 15% higher than Europe’s; and US GDP per capita is over 30% higher. • From the end of the Second World War until the mid-1990s, Europe was catching up with US levels of productivity. But since then, US productivity growth has been faster than in Europe. • In 2000, the European Union (EU) launched the ‘Lisbon agenda’. This had the aim of making Europe ‘the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth, with more and better jobs, greater social cohesion and respect for the environment’. • Stimulating innovation was seen as a major route to reaching this goal. In particular, the EU set the ‘Barcelona target’ of increasing research and development (R&D) to 3% of GDP by 2010. The Lisbon agenda has not realised its objectives. A major reason for this is the failure of EU members to liberalise their product and labour markets. • Although the numerical target for R&D makes little economic sense, the emphasis on innovation as a route to growth is sensible. • The cost of patenting in Europe is about five times the cost of patenting in the United States. The suggested introduction of a ‘Community patent’ would lower this cost and make it easier for European firms to patent their innovations. • The ‘brain drain’ from the EU to the United States – because of better research opportunities and higher wages – is still a significant phenomenon. The Lisbon agenda’s aim of reversing this trend has not materialised.

Item Type: Monograph (Report)
Official URL: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/
Additional Information: © 2006 London School of Economics and Political Science, Center of Economic Performance
Divisions: Centre for Economic Performance
Subjects: D History General and Old World > D History (General)
D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D901 Europe (General)
JEL classification: O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Sets: Research centres and groups > Centre for Economic Performance (CEP)
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2014 09:18
Last Modified: 09 Nov 2020 00:31
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/57956

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics