Cartwright, Nancy (2013) Knowing what we are talking about: why evidence doesn't always travel. Evidence and Policy: a Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9 (1). pp. 97-112. ISSN 1744-2648
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
When is a well-established study result that a given policy/programme/treatment produced a given outcome in a particular study setting ('there') evidence that that policy/programme/treatment will produce that outcome in a new setting ('here')? This paper insists that 'there' and 'here' be firmly distinguished and offers in answer that we must have evidence that two further facts obtain: (a) that the policy can play the same causal role widely (widely enough to cover both here and there) and (b) that a complete set of the support factors necessary for the policy to operate here are present in some individuals here.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/ep/2013/... |
| Additional Information: | © 2013 Policy Press |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Jul 2014 15:38 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Nov 2024 08:24 |
| Projects: | AH/H007857/1 |
| Funders: | Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/57381 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
