Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements

Burchardt, Tania (2014) Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements. Qualitative Research, 14 (3). pp. 353-370. ISSN 1468-7941

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1177/1468794112469624

Abstract

The purpose of deliberation as a research technique (as opposed to policymaking or public consultation) is distinctive: to uncover the public's informed, considered and collective view on a normative question. Such questions often arise in relation to research on poverty and inequality, where there is a need to justify the thresholds and concepts adopted on a deeper basis than convention alone can offer. But can deliberative research provide the answer, and if so in what circumstances? By comparing deliberative research to more traditional methods, such as in-depth interviewing, attitudinal surveys, ethnography and participatory approaches, this article reveals that deliberative designs involve a number of assumptions, including a strong fact/value distinction, an emphasis on 'outsider' expertise and a view of participants as essentially similar to each other rather than defined by socio-demographic differences. Using an example of deliberative research in which the author was involved, developing a list of 'capabilities' for monitoring inequalities in Britain, it also demonstrates that normative decisions permeate the design and implementation of deliberative research in practice. Thus, while deliberative research has the potential to provide uniquely considered, insightful and well-justified answers to the problem of defining a collective position on key questions in social science, it is currently under-theorised as an approach, and transparency at all stages of the process is essential to avoid the charge of simply reflecting the researchers' implicit values.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://qrj.sagepub.com/
Additional Information: © 2014 by SAGE Publications
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
JEL classification: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods and Programming > C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
Date Deposited: 12 Jun 2014 16:26
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2020 05:25
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/57043

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item