Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Reinforcement of multilevel governance dynamics: creating momentum for increasing ambitions in international climate negotiations

Rietig, Katharina (2014) Reinforcement of multilevel governance dynamics: creating momentum for increasing ambitions in international climate negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14 (4). pp. 371-389. ISSN 1567-9764

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1007/s10784-014-9239-4

Abstract

Compared to the disappointment of the 2009 climate summit in Copenhagen, the results of the recent Conferences of the Parties can be regarded as positive progress. This was made possible due to lesson drawing and learning among states. Recent evidence from the UNFCCC negotiations suggests that countries began to reflect on the “Copenhagen experience.” They are setting up domestic climate legislation in the form of low carbon development plans and share their knowledge and experiences in the international climate change negotiations. Country representatives engage in workshops and roundtables to showcase their mitigation plans and low carbon development initiatives, thereby raising ambitions and creating group pressure on other countries. This article examines how the diffusion of policies across countries is motivated and facilitated by knowledge transfer and learning within multilevel-reinforcing governance dynamics between the domestic level and international negotiations. It analyzes how changes in the negotiation setting from confrontational formal negotiations to a more open forum and bottom-up pledge-and-review process, in combination with a positively framed win–win low carbon economic development narrative resulted in the diffusion of climate policies across developed and developing countries. Communicating these climate initiatives on the national level has shifted the debate. Countries emphasize less the win–lose perspective of economic costs and sacrifice. Thus, they focus less on the question of who should reduce emissions’, but identify co-benefits instead. The institutionalized knowledge sharing within the UNFCCC is also creating positive competitive dynamics among countries to increase their ambition and to take on a leadership role. This shift in the negotiations carries potential for a more ambitious aggregate negotiation outcome and opens up a window of opportunity.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/journal/10784
Additional Information: © 2014 Springer, Part of Springer Science+Business Media
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
Sets: Departments > Geography and Environment
Research centres and groups > Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
Date Deposited: 14 Apr 2014 13:02
Last Modified: 20 May 2020 02:58
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/56522

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item