Goodwin, Mark (2014) Do we need more scientists in Parliament? They may not make any difference. Democratic Audit Blog (10 Feb 2014). Website.
  | 
            
              
PDF
 - Published Version
 Download (67kB) | Preview  | 
          
Abstract
There is one scientist in the current House of Commons, and only a handful more with any kind of scientific background. This fact is frequently used to illustrate Parliament’s apparent inability to bring about evidence-based policymaking. However, as Mark Goodwin argues, parliamentarians with scientific backgrounds don’t tend to vote any differently from their non-elected counterparts, suggesting that either efforts to improve the number of scientists in the House are either pointless, or that they make their expert contributions in other, less visible, ways.
| Item Type: | Online resource (Website) | 
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.democraticaudit.com/ | 
| Additional Information: | © Democratic Audit UK | 
| Divisions: | LSE | 
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain Q Science > Q Science (General)  | 
        
| Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2014 15:42 | 
| Last Modified: | 10 Sep 2025 08:13 | 
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/56292 | 
Actions (login required)
![]()  | 
        View Item | 
                                    
 Download Statistics
 Download Statistics