Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Bureaucratic 'criminal' law: too much of a bad thing?

Horder, Jeremy (2014) Bureaucratic 'criminal' law: too much of a bad thing? SSRN Electronic Journal. pp. 1-34. ISSN 1556-5068

PDF - Published Version
Download (445kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.2139/ssrn.2335976


My main aim is to argue for the legitimacy of ‘regulatory’ criminal law. Historically more significant as a feature of statecraft than its critics have been prepared to admit, I defend a number of the controversial characteristics of such law. Such features include its tendency to come in the form of numerous discrete offences (where the common law was satisfied with one or two general offences), its preoccupation with less ‘serious’ forms of wrongdoing, and its reliance on omission-based liability. The plausibility of these claims comes through shifting the focus away from the favoured moral high ground of traditional critics of bureaucratic criminal law: the interests and concerns of the individual, as the object of criminalisation. A very large proportion of bureaucratic criminal law is aimed at companies, as objects of criminalisation. Whilst companies must be dealt with in a fair and proportionate manner by the criminal law, as entities they lack the capacity for emotional suffering, dignity and autonomy that would otherwise place greater constraints on the scope for the criminalisation of their activities. In developing my views, I try to maintain a healthy scepticism about the viability of identifying a set of laws that are uniquely and distinctively ‘criminal’.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2014 The Author
Divisions: Law
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2014 11:50
Last Modified: 30 Aug 2021 23:15

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics