Reply to Crisp

Otsuka, Michael and Voorhoeve, Alex ORCID: 0000-0003-3240-3835 (2011) Reply to Crisp. Utilitas, 23 (1). pp. 109-114. ISSN 0953-8208

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We are grateful for, but unconvinced by, Roger Crisp's defence of the Priority View against our critique. In this reply, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information:	© 2011 Cambridge University Press
Divisions:	Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics J Political Science > JC Political theory
Date Deposited:	07 Nov 2013 10:34
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2024 05:22
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/54182

Actions (login required)

View Item