Otsuka, Michael and Voorhoeve, Alex (2011) Reply to Crisp. Utilitas, 23 (1). pp. 109-114. ISSN 0953-8208
Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1017/S095382081000049X
Abstract
We are grateful for, but unconvinced by, Roger Crisp's defence of the Priority View against our critique. In this reply, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna... |
| Additional Information: | © 2011 Cambridge University Press |
| Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics J Political Science > JC Political theory |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Nov 2013 10:34 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 23:14 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/54182 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
