Norton, John D. and Roberts, Bryan W. (2012) Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall rehabilitated. Centaurus, 54 (2). pp. 148-164. ISSN 00088994
Abstract
Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall in his Two New Sciences is routinely dismissed as a moment of confused argumentation. We urge that Galileo's argument correctly identified why the speed-distance law is untenable, failing only in its very last step. Using an ingenious combination of scaling and self-similarity arguments, Galileo found correctly that bodies, falling from rest according to this law, fall all distances in equal times. What he failed to recognize in the last step is that this time is infinite, the result of an exponential dependence of distance on time. Instead, Galileo conflated it with the other motion that satisfies this ‘equal time’ property, instantaneous motion.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2012.00260.x |
| Additional Information: | © 2012 John Wiley & Sons |
| Library of Congress subject classification: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic |
| Sets: | Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Nov 2013 15:34 |
| URL: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/54083/ |
Actions (login required)
 |
Record administration - authorised staff only |
