Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Hume’s theorem

Howson, Colin (2013) Hume’s theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44 (3). pp. 339-346. ISSN 00393681

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A common criticism of Hume’s famous anti-induction argument is that it is vitiated because it fails to foreclose the possibility of an authentically probabilistic justification of induction. I argue that this claim is false, and that on the contrary, the probability calculus itself, in the form of an elementary consequence that I call Hume’s Theorem, fully endorses Hume’s argument. Various objections, including the often-made claim that Hume is defeated by de Finetti’s exchangeability results, are considered and rejected.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/studies-in-histor...
Additional Information: © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Library of Congress subject classification: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Sets: Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Rights: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/usingTheLibrary/academicSupport/OA/depositYourResearch.aspx
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2013 14:49
URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51044/

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only