Kaldor, Mary (2013) In defence of new wars. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2 (1). ISSN 2165-2627
|
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (659kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on ‘new wars’. It argues that ‘new wars’ should be understood not as an empirical category but rather as a way of elucidating the logic of contemporary war that can offer both a research strategy and a guide to policy. It addresses four components of the debate: whether new wars are ‘new’; whether new wars are war or crime; whether the data supports the claims about new wars; and whether new wars are ‘post-Clausewitzean’. It argues that the obsession with the ‘newness’ of wars misses the point about the logic of new wars; that there is a blurring of war and crime but it is important to address the political elements of new wars; that, although the data should be used with caution, it does seem to offer support for some elements of the new war thesis; and that the argument is indeed post-Clausewitzean because new wars are not ‘contests of wills’ but more similar to a mutual enterprise. It concludes that the debate has greatly enriched the overall argument.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.stabilityjournal.org/index |
Additional Information: | © 2013 The Authors |
Divisions: | International Development |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2013 13:18 |
Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2024 00:30 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/49500 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |