Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The ethical and economic case for sweatshop regulation

Coakley, M. and Kates, Michael (2012) The ethical and economic case for sweatshop regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, online. pp. 1-6. ISSN 0167-4544

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1007/s10551-012-1540-y

Abstract

Three types of objections have been raised against sweatshops. According to their critics, sweatshops are (1) exploitative, (2) coercive, and (3) harmful to workers. In "The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment," Powell and Zwolinski critique all three objections and thereby offer what is arguably the most powerful defense of sweatshops in the philosophical literature to date. This article demonstrates that, whether or not unregulated sweatshops are exploitative or coercive, they are, pace Powell and Zwolinski, harmful to workers. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/applied+et...
Additional Information: © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Divisions: Government
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Sets: Departments > Government
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2012 15:13
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2019 10:14
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/47459

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item