Jenco, Leigh Kathryn (2003) Thoreau's critique of democracy. The review of politics, 65 (3). pp. 355-381. ISSN 0034-6705
Most commentators see Henry David Thoreau's political essays as an endorsement of liberal democracy, but this essay holds that Thoreau's critique of majoritarianism and his model of civil disobedience may intend something much more radical: when his criticisms of representative democracy are articulated in more formal terms of political and moral obligation, it becomes clear that the theory and practice of democracy fundamentally conflict with Thoreau's conviction in moral autonomy and conscientious action. His critical examination of the way in which a democratic state threatens the commitments that facilitate and give meaning to the practice of morality intends to reorient the focus of politics, away from institutions and toward the people such institutions were ostensibly in place to serve. His critique stands as a warning that becoming complacent about democracy will inhibit the search for better (perhaps more liberal) ways to organize political life.
|Additional Information:||© 2003 Cambridge University Press|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||J Political Science > JC Political theory|
|Sets:||Departments > Government|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|