Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarity

Rol, Menno and Cartwright, Nancy (2012) Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarity. Theoria: Revista de Teoria, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 27 (2). pp. 189-202. ISSN 0495-4548

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1387/theoria.4075


To what use can causal claims established in good policy studies be put? We isolate two reasons inferences from study to target fail. First, policy variables do not produce results on their own; they need helping factors. The distribution of helping factors is likely to be unique or local for each study, so one cannot expect external validity to be all that common. Second, researchers often give too concrete a description of the cause in the study for it to carry over to the target. Abstraction is necessary to get causes that travel. There is no sure-fire way to guard against these problems. But the unavailability of one perfect tool does not imply there are no second best contrivances. Two general pointers for Good Practice in policy advice follow from our diagnosis: focus on the concrete details in the target and use cross discipline heuristics that diversify background knowledge.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2012 CC
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic
Date Deposited: 13 Jul 2012 09:21
Last Modified: 16 May 2024 01:27

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item