Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask

Frigg, Roman ORCID: 0000-0003-0812-0907 and Votsis, Ioannis (2011) Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1 (2). pp. 227-276. ISSN 1879-4912

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1007/s13194-011-0025-7

Abstract

A structuralist perspective is one that sees the investigation of the structural features of a domain of interest as the primary goal of enquiry. This vision has shaped research programmes in fields as diverse as linguistics, literary criticism, aesthetics, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and various branches of philosophy. The focus of this paper is structuralism in the philosophy of science, and in particular those movements that have endeavoured to articulate a structural version of scientific realism, now commonly referred to as structural realism (SR). The paper provides a critical survey of the debates raging over structural realism: it provides explicit statements of the different positions as well as the arguments put forward to support them, clarifies how the different positions relate to one another, draws attention to hitherto neglected arguments, and evaluates criticisms launched against different strands of SR. Attention to the history of the field is paid in as far as this is essential to understanding the contemporary scene, but documenting the long and intricate development of SR is beyond the scope of this paper. We begin by introducing the set theoretic conception of structure on which many of the positions that we are concerned with rely (Section 2). In Section 3 we introduce the two main strands of epistemic structural realism, discuss the central objections levelled against them, most notably Newman's objection, and present the Ramsey sentence formulation. Section 4 is dedicated to a discussion of ontic structural realism. In Section 5 we offer some concluding remarks.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/k9nth4tu2850u7...
Additional Information: © 2011 Springer
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
CPNSS
Centre for Analysis of Time Series
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Q Science > Q Science (General)
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2011 09:45
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2024 23:58
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/39732

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item