Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Causality in medicine: getting back to the Hill top

Worrall, John (2011) Causality in medicine: getting back to the Hill top. Preventive Medicine, 53 (4-5). pp. 235-238. ISSN 0091-7435

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.009


Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is almost universally regarded as setting the "gold standard" for medical evidence. Claims that RCTs carry special epistemic weight are often based on the notion that evidence from randomized studies, and only such evidence, can establish that any observed connection between treatment and outcome was caused by the treatment on trial. Any non-randomized trial, on the contrary, inevitably leaves open the possibility that there is some underlying connection independent of receiving the treatment between outcome and one or more differentiating characteristics between those in the experimental and control groups; and hence inevitably leaves open the possibility that treatment and an observed better outcome were "merely correlated" rather than directly causally connected. Here I scrutinize this argument and point towards a more tenable and more modest position by recalling some of the forgotten insights of the RCT pioneer, Austin Bradford Hill.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2011 Elsevier
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2011 09:05
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2024 00:09

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item