Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Different things make different people happy: examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status

Kroll, Christian (2011) Different things make different people happy: examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status. Social Indicators Research, 104 (1). pp. 157-177. ISSN 0303-8300

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11205-010-9733-1


This paper addresses a number of key challenges in current subjective well-being (SWB) research: A new wave of studies should take into account that different things may make different people happy, thus going beyond a unitary 'happiness formula'. Furthermore, empirical results need to be connected to broader theoretical narratives. Using a re-examination of the social context of well-being as its case study, this article therefore resorts to sociological theory and fills a gap by investigating how social capital is correlated in different ways with the SWB of men, women, parents, and non-parents. Ordered logit and OLS regression analyses systematically examine slope heterogeneity using UK data from the European Social Survey. It turns out that civic engagement is not at all associated with higher life satisfaction for mothers, while the relationship is positive for men and strongest for childless women. Moreover, informal socialising is positively and more strongly associated with life satisfaction among women, although only when OLS is used. In sum, the social context of well-being varies considerably by gender and parental status. Mothers do not seem to benefit from formal social capital, indicating a "motherhood penalty" (see Correll et al., Am J Sociol 112(5):1297-1338 in 2007) regarding the psychological rewards usually associated with volunteering. Given the high levels of formal social capital among mothers, the findings also highlight the importance of the homo sociologicus concept. Consequently, SWB research can be successfully used to provide new insights into long-standing interdisciplinary theory debates such as the one on homo economicus versus homo sociologicus.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2011 Springer Netherlands
Divisions: Sociology
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2011 08:36
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2021 00:45

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item