Dodge, Toby ORCID: 0000-0003-1262-4921 (2006) Iraq: the contradictions of exogenous state-building in historical perspective. Third World Quarterly, 27 (1). pp. 187-200. ISSN 0143-6597
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This article compares Britain's failed attempt at building a stable, liberal state in Iraq from 1914 to 1932 with the USA's struggle to stabilise the country after regime change in April 2003. It sets out a template for endogenous state-building based on the evolution of the European state system. It then compares this to exogenous extra-European state-building after both World War I and the Cold War. It focuses on three key stages: the imposition of order, the move from coercive to administrative capacity and finally the evolution of a collective civic identity linked to the state. It is this process against which Iraqi state-building by the British in the 1920s and by the USA from 2003 onwards can be accurately judged to have failed. For both the British and American occupations, troop numbers were one of the central problems undermining the stability of Iraq. British colonial officials never had the resources to transform the despotic power deployed by the state into sustainable infrastructural capacity. Instead they relied on hakumat al tayarra (government by aircraft). The dependence upon air power led to the neglect of other state institutions, stunting the growth of infrastructural power and hence state legitimacy. The US occupation has never managed to impose despotic power, having failed to obtain a monopoly over the collective deployment of violence. Instead it has relied on ‘indigenisation’, the hurried creation of a new Iraqi army. The result has been the security vacuum that dominates the south and centre of the country. The article concludes by suggesting that unsuccessful military occupations usually end after a change of government in the intervening country. This was the case for the British in May 1929 and may well be the case for the USA after the next presidential election in 2008.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ctwq20/current |
Additional Information: | © 2006 Third World Quarterly |
Divisions: | International Relations Middle East Centre |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JZ International relations |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2011 14:48 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 23:04 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/38831 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |