Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Climate change, securitisation and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Mason, Michael ORCID: 0000-0002-8831-0593 (2013) Climate change, securitisation and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Geographical Journal, 179 (4). pp. 298-308. ISSN 0016-7398

PDF - Accepted Version
Download (545kB) | Preview

Identification Number: 10.1111/geoj.12007


Securitisation theory serves as a useful corrective to the ‘climate determinism’ evident in mainstream debates on the security effects of climate change, but there are divergences within this approach over what constitutes ‘successful’ securitisation. For the Copenhagen School, climate change has not been securitised because relevant state actors do not yet accept that emergency measures are necessary to tackle ‘dangerous’ climate risks. In contrast, ‘sociological’ proponents of securitisation theory identify ‘successful’ securitisation evident from climate policies that would not otherwise have been undertaken without the political mobilisation of crisis narratives concerning threats to human and ecosystem health. These marked differences over climate change reflect, I argue, divergent spatialities deployed within securitisation theory. The Copenhagen School posits state-bounded territoriality as the power container dominating global security dynamics, viewing climate change as a weaker, deterritorial source of securitisation. Sociological approaches admit a wider set of security effects arising from the political mobilisation of climate threats because securitisation is claimed to emerge from diverse performative spaces. A critical application of securitisation theory to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict reveals insights from both strands on the outcomes of attempts to portray climate change as a regional security threat. However, I contend that the spatial analytics of securitisation theory miss vertical forms of power that, in the case of Israeli occupational practices, feature use of a climate threat scenario to reinforce processes of military-political domination

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2013 The Author. The Geographical Journal © 2013 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
Divisions: Geography & Environment
Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2011 10:42
Last Modified: 09 Jul 2024 07:15

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics