Coco, Giuseppe and de Meza, David ORCID: 0000-0002-5638-8310 (2009) In defense of usury laws. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41 (8). pp. 1691-1703. ISSN 0022-2879
Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00274.x
Abstract
Usury law is often criticized by economists for curtailing lending and thus creating deadweight costs. This paper shows that if moral hazard leads to credit rationing, a just-binding usury law creates a deadweight gain. This property also holds in most market-clearing equilibria. Independent of social insurance benefits, or curbing present-biased preferences, interest rate caps have merit.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(IS... |
Additional Information: | © 2009 The Ohio State University |
Divisions: | Management |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
Date Deposited: | 10 May 2011 15:48 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2024 03:36 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/36071 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |