Besley, Timothy and Coate, Stephen (2008) Issue unbundling via citizens initiatives. Quarterly journal of political science, 3 (4). pp. 379-397. ISSN 1554-0626
The role of citizens' initiatives figures prominently in contemporary debates on constitutional change. It is widely believed that permitting initiatives should improve the congruence between citizen preferences and policy outcomes across the spectrum of issues on which initiatives may be placed. This paper investigates the theoretical basis for this view. It begins by identifying three basic reasons why electoral competition may not, by itself, be sufficient to ensure congruence on specific issues. Each reason relies critically on the fact that citizens have only one vote to cast for candidates who have responsibility for choosing a bundle of issues. It then shows how allowing initiatives permits the unbundling of specific issues which improves congruence when the three reasons apply. Important caveats to this logic are also presented.
|Additional Information:||© 2008 T. Besley and S. Coate|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
|Sets:||Research centres and groups > Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD)|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|