Worrall, John (2010) For universal rules, against induction. Philosophy of Science, 77 (5). pp. 740-753. ISSN 0031-8248
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This essay criticizes John Norton's 2010 defense of the thesis that "all induction is local." Norton's local inductions are bound, if cogent, to involve general principles, and the need to accredit these general principles threatens to lead to all the usual problems associated with the 'problem of induction'. Norton, in fact, recognizes this threat, but his responses are inadequate. The right response involves not induction but a sophisticated version of hypothetico-deduction. Norton's secondary thesis - that if there is a general account of cogent scientific reasoning, then it is certainly not the one supported by personalist Bayesians - is also criticized.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journa... |
| Additional Information: | © 2010 by the Philosophy of Science Association |
| Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method CPNSS |
| Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2011 11:58 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Nov 2024 02:09 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/33582 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
