Suárez, Mauricio (2004) Quantum selections, propensities and the problem of measurement. The British journal for the philosophy of science, 55 (2). pp. 219-255. ISSN 0007-0882
This paper expands on, and provides a qualified defence of, Arthur Fine's selective interactions solution to the measurement problem. Fine's approach must be understood against the background of the insolubility proof of the quantum measurement. I first defend the proof as an appropriate formal representation of the quantum measurement problem. The nature of selective interactions, and more generally selections, is then clarified, and three arguments in their favour are offered. First, selections provide the only known solution to the measurement problem that does not relinquish any of the explicit premises of the insolubility proofs. Second, unlike some no-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics, selections suffer no difficulties with non-ideal measurements. Third, unlike most collapse interpretations, selections can be independently motivated by an appeal to quantum propensities.
|Additional Information:||© 2004 British Society for the Philosophy of Science|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Q Science > QC Physics
|Sets:||Research centres and groups > Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS)|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|