Cookson, Richard and Dolan, Paul (2000) Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26 (5). pp. 323-329. ISSN 0306-6800
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts three different substantive (as opposed to procedural) principles of justice for making health care priority-setting or “rationing” decisions: need principles, maximising principles and egalitarian principles. The principles are compared by tracing out their implications for a hypothetical rationing decision involving four identified patients. This decision has been the subject of an empirical study of public opinion based on small-group discussions, which found that the public seem to support a pluralistic combination of all three kinds of rationing principle. In conclusion, it is suggested that there is room for further work by philosophers and others on the development of a coherent and pluralistic theory of health care rationing which accords with public opinions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://jme.bmj.com/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. |
| Divisions: | Social Policy |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Mar 2011 16:39 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Mar 2024 03:45 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/33027 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
