Burchardt, Tania ORCID: 0000-0003-4822-4954 (2009) Agency goals, adaptation and capability sets. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10 (1). pp. 3-19. ISSN 1945-2829
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
'Agency goals' play an important role in Sen's capability approach. They are an acknowledgement that individuals aspire to achieve objectives other than their own immediate well-being. This article argues that using agency goal achievement as a basis for evaluating inequality or disadvantage is problematic. In particular, one of the principal charges against utilitarianism made by capability theorists — that based on adaptation or conditioned expectations — can be made with equal force and validity against a metric based on agency goals. The argument is illustrated using survey data on the educational and occupational aspirations of a cohort of young people in Britain. The article concludes that the conventional cross-sectional, objective, definition of a capability set needs to be broadened. Only if the capability set from which agency goals are formed and the capability set within which they are pursued are evaluated can we begin to properly assess substantive freedom.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/cjhd |
Additional Information: | © Taylor & Francis |
Divisions: | Social Policy |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform |
Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2011 15:20 |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 22:36 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/32506 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |