Beisbart, Claus and Bovens, Luc (2008) A power measure analysis of Amendment 36 in Colorado. Public Choice, 134 (3-4). pp. 231-246. ISSN 0048-5829
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Colorado’s Amendment 36 proposed to switch Colorado’s representation in the Electoral College from winner-takes-all to proportionality. We evaluate unilateral and uniform switches to proportionality both from Colorado’s perspective and from an impartial perspective on the basis of a priori and a posteriori voting power measures. The present system is to be preferred to a unilateral switch from any perspective on any measure. A uniform switch is to be preferred to the present system from Colorado’s perspective on an a priori measure, and from an impartial perspective on an a posteriori measure. The present system is to be preferred to a uniform switch from Colorado’s perspective on an a posteriori measure (with some qualifications), and from an impartial perspective on an a priori measure. We conclude with a discussion of the appropriateness of these measures.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.springer.com/economics/public+finance/j... |
Additional Information: | © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jan 2011 16:42 |
Last Modified: | 03 Jun 2024 16:03 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/31663 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |