Lentzos, Filippa and Rose, Nikolas (2009) Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection, resilience. Economy and Society, 38 (2). pp. 230-254. ISSN 1469-5766
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
How should we understand the politics of security today? This article addresses this question from one particular perspective, that of 'biosecurity'. It examines contemporary strategies for managing biorisks in three European states: France, Germany and the United Kingdom. We suggest that the framing of threat and response differs, even within Europe, and that one can identify three different configurations: contingency planning, protection and resilience. Each of these embodies a significantly different way of reconciling fundamental imperatives for those who would govern a liberal society today - the imperative of freedom and the imperative of security.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~cont... |
| Additional Information: | © 2009 Taylor & Francis |
| Divisions: | Sociology |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JZ International relations |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2011 15:48 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2024 23:32 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/30354 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
