Gee, Graham and Webber, Grégoire C. N. (2010) What is a political constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (2). pp. 273-299. ISSN 0143-6503
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
Download (475kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The question—what is a political constitution?—might seem, at first blush, fairly innocuous. At one level, the idea of a political constitution seems fairly well settled, at least insofar as most political constitutionalists subscribe to a similar set of commitments, arguments and assumptions. At a second, more reflective level, however, there remains some doubt whether a political constitution purports to be a descriptive or normative account of a real world constitution, such as Britain’s. By exploring the idea of a political constitution as differently articulated by J.A.G. Griffith, Adam Tomkins and Richard Bellamy, this essay explores why the normativity of a political constitution may be indistinct and ill-defined, and how compelling reasons for this indistinctness and ill-definition are to be found in the very idea of a political constitution itself. A political constitution is here conceived as a ‘model’ which supplies an explanatory framework within which to make sense of our constitutional self-understandings. The discipline of thinking in terms of a model opens up a critical space wherein there need not be some stark, all-encompassing choice between constitutional models, which, in turn, allows for more subtle understandings of Britain’s constitution as neither exclusively ‘political’ nor ‘legal’.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Additional Information: | © 2010 the authors |
Divisions: | Law |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JC Political theory K Law > K Law (General) J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General) |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2010 11:36 |
Last Modified: | 20 Nov 2024 01:06 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/28151 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |